Wednesday, January 23, 2008

putao joe wrote...

Hey, Bob:

If a publisher told you to stop repeatedly using the contraction it’s for the possessive pronoun its, as in these examples:

pointing out mostly it's negative aspects

make friends with it's people

I learn it’s official language

description of it's negatives

would you also go to another publisher?

Sunday, January 20, 2008

the cardinal rule

Sounds like you are having pretty good success breaking "the cardinal rule" as prescribed by all the other johnny come latelies, namely, "Use English. Don't use English to describe English." I have never understood that rule. You can use English to do all manner of things. You can use it to describe how to build a car, or you can use it to describe how to build a sentence. You are still using English. You can use English to explain that words have something that might be called a collocational field, change one word here and you'll likely need to change a word over there. You can use English to explain that there exists something called a Universal Grammar and yes, for christ's sake, you do need to be able to clearly identify the subject of a sentence. You can explain that modifying phrases and clauses in English tend to follow the thing they describe, unlike in Chinese where they tend to proceed it. You can use it to explain that words that might appear synonymous are still to be distinguished by their connotation. You can use English to explain that words are like people and it sometimes takes quite awhile to get to know them. In one situation they appear to mean one thing and in another they mean something quite different. Most words in English are homonyms and most have personalities. "Do" has a great personality and is sticking his nose in everywhere. Little bastard. "Have" is a clingy little witch, and even the dullest among us can be taught to contemplate buddha at the sight of "Be." They might not understand much of this so you can demonstrate using gestures, or say say it in Chinese before translating back to English. It's all quite charming really.

There was show on the discovery channel the other night about a teacher who therorized that it should be possible to create a genius out of anybody, and he set about proving it on his own daughter. I am not going to tell you what he did first because I want you to guess. It was a profoundly simple first step, and if you don't guess it before it comes along here you'll be enlightened when it does. It's REALLY simple. Did you get it yet? No? I'll just ramble along here awhile longer. Let your tired tired eyes whiz across the screen, perhaps it'll come to you.... If you want to create a genius out of anybody the first thing is to.... got it yet? If you want to create a genius out of anybody the first thing is to find out what they love doing.
If they don't love anything, and there exist on this tiny island an incredible number of sad souls who don't, introduce them to movies and music. Everybody loves movies and music, though perhpas they don't know it yet. Having gotten the ball rolling that way you can do all kinds of things, heck you can use English to talk about English if you want.

Thursday, January 17, 2008

sensible people

Guantou wrote - Moving right along...

Sensible people accept the idea that global warming is happening and that it is an anthropogenic effect. The line of reasoning works like this:

(1) CO2, methane and a small handful of other gases have a greenhouse effect - that is, they prevent the heat created by sunlight striking the earth's surface returning to space. Take away greenhouse gases and you lose this greenhouse effect. The dark/night side of Mercury (a planet without atmosphere to carry greenhouse gases) is typically around minus 130 degrees centigrade. The day side is up around 430 degrees. Venus, with high concentrations of CO2 in its atmosphere, is bloody hot pretty much everywhere all the time.

(2) The present atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide has not been exceeded for the past 650,000 years, and probably not for the last 20 million years - we know this through ice core analysis (very persuasive data) and geological sampling (indicative data). For most of this period (i.e. 20 million years) atmospheric concentrations of CO2 have varied between around 180 parts per million (ppm) and 280ppm. Since the late 18th Century, however, CO2 concentrations have increased to around 380ppm. At presents rates of increase, we should hit 450ppm by the middle of the century.

(3) The cause of this rapid increase in CO2 in the most recent period (i.e. since the start of the industrial revolution) is most likely burning of fossil fuels (coal, oil and gas), and agricultural practices (e.g. land clearing). That is, anthropogenic sources of CO2 emissions are the most obvious source of additional CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere.

(4) There has been an increase in global average temperatures in the scale of 0.7 degrees centigrade over the last 100 years.

Sensible people look at this line-up of facts and causal relationships and conclude that (1) global warming is happening, and (2) people are causing it. This is not an hysterical or uninformed position. We base many other important public and private decisions on much less surity. IMHO, the strength of these conclusions suggests that the burden of proof resides with those who are skeptical about them, rather than those who accept them.

Monday, January 14, 2008

precious moments

Sometimes I wonder how many people will die and the leave the best parts of themselves scattered across the blogosphere, and whether that will interest anyone. Will they do a bunch of research and write a biography that sells a million copies and becomes a movie of the week earning billions of dollars in advertsing revenue for a television station. Other times I'm more introspective and philosphical, and during those times I like to finger paint while enjoying a delightful beverage, Nescafe perhaps. I stare off into the distance in a contemplative manner and somebody captures the moment for diplay on the side of a bus.

precious moments

I wonder how many people will die and the leave the best parts of themselves scattered across the blogosphere, and whether that will interest anyone. Will they do a bunch of research and write a biography that sells a million copies and becomes a movie of the week earning billions of dollars in advertsing revenue for a television station. Other times I'm more introspective and philosphical, and during those times I like to finger paint while enjoying a delightful beverage, Nescafe perhaps. I stare off into the distance in a contemplative manner and somebody captures the moment for diplay on the side of a bus.

Sunday, January 13, 2008

the third millenium

I was sitting at Dante today having a cup of coffee and a gorgeous young woman sat down at a table opposite. It wasn't long before I noticed that she was making cutsie faces. I smiled back and to my suprise she went through a whole range of new cutsie faces in response, from the sweetly demure to the outright flirtatious. Then I realized that she wasn't actually looking at me. No, dear reader, it wasn't me, and nor was it you. The object of her attentions it turned out, was herself. She was looking in a mirror.