Monday, April 28, 2008

uni u

A tit fixation is admittedly an infantile thing, but I ask you, you universal you you, do you want to criticize a baby? Frued was a cocaine addict who knew much about horror.

Monday, April 21, 2008

caught in the middle

Caught in the Middle, Called a TraitorI study languages -- Italian, French and German. And this summer -- now that it looks as though I won't be able to go home to China -- I'll take up Arabic. My goal is to master 10 languages, in addition to Chinese and English, by the time I'm 30.

I want to do this because I believe that language is the bridge to understanding. Take China and Tibet. If more Chinese learned the Tibetan language, and if Tibetans learned more about China, I'm convinced that our two peoples would understand one another better and we could overcome the current crisis between us peacefully. I feel that even more strongly after what happened here at Duke University a little more than a week ago.

Trying to mediate between Chinese and pro-Tibetan campus protesters, I was caught in the middle and vilified and threatened by the Chinese. After the protest, the intimidation continued online, and I began receiving threatening phone calls. Then it got worse -- my parents in China were also threatened and forced to go into hiding. And I became persona non grata in my native country.

It has been a frightening and unsettling experience. But I'm determined to speak out, even in the face of threats and abuse. If I stay silent, then the same thing will happen to someone else someday.

So here's my story.

When I first arrived at Duke last August, I was afraid I wouldn't like it. It's in the small town of Durham, N.C., and I'm from Qingdao, a city of 4.3 million. But I eventually adjusted, and now I really love it. It's a diverse environment, with people from all over the world. Over Christmas break, all the American students went home, but that's too expensive for students from China. Since the dorms and the dining halls were closed, I was housed off-campus with four Tibetan classmates for more than three weeks.

I had never really met or talked to a Tibetan before, even though we're from the same country. Every day we cooked together, ate together, played chess and cards. And of course, we talked about our different experiences growing up on opposite sides of the People's Republic of China. It was eye-opening for me.

I'd long been interested in Tibet and had a romantic vision of the Land of Snows, but I'd never been there. Now I learned that the Tibetans have a different way of seeing the world. My classmates were Buddhist and had a strong faith, which inspired me to reflect on my own views about the meaning of life. I had been a materialist, as all Chinese are taught to be, but now I could see that there's something more, that there's a spiritual side to life.

We talked a lot in those three weeks, and of course we spoke in Chinese. The Tibetan language isn't the language of instruction in the better secondary schools there and is in danger of disappearing. Tibetans must be educated in Mandarin Chinese to succeed in our extremely capitalistic culture. This made me sad, and made me want to learn their language as they had learned mine.

I was reminded of all this on the evening of April 9. As I left the cafeteria planning to head to the library to study, I saw people holding Tibetan and Chinese flags facing each other in the middle of the quad. I hadn't heard anything about a protest, so I was curious and went to have a look. I knew people in both groups, and I went back and forth between them, asking their views. It seemed silly to me that they were standing apart, not talking to each other. I know that this is often due to a language barrier, as many Chinese here are scientists and engineers and aren't confident of their English.

I thought I'd try to get the two groups together and initiate some dialogue, try to get everybody thinking from a broader perspective. That's what Lao Tzu, Sun Tzu and Confucius remind us to do. And I'd learned from my dad early on that disagreement is nothing to be afraid of. Unfortunately, there's a strong Chinese view nowadays that critical thinking and dissidence create problems, so everyone should just keep quiet and maintain harmony.

A lot has been made of the fact that I wrote the words "Free Tibet" on the back of the American organizer of the protest, who was someone I knew. But I did this at his request, and only after making him promise that he would talk to the Chinese group. I never dreamed how the Chinese would seize on this innocent action. The leaders of the two groups did at one point try to communicate, but the attempt wasn't very successful.

The Chinese protesters thought that, being Chinese, I should be on their side. The participants on the Tibet side were mostly Americans, who really don't have a good understanding of how complex the situation is. Truthfully, both sides were being quite closed-minded and refusing to consider the other's perspective. I thought I could help try to turn a shouting match into an exchange of ideas. So I stood in the middle and urged both sides to come together in peace and mutual respect. I believe that they have a lot in common and many more similarities than differences.

But the Chinese protesters -- who were much more numerous, maybe 100 or more -- got increasingly emotional and vocal and wouldn't let the other side speak. They pushed the small Tibetan group of just a dozen or so up against the Duke Chapel doors, yelling "Liars, liars, liars!" This upset me. It was so aggressive, and all Chinese know the moral injunction: Junzi dongkou, bu dongshou (The wise person uses his tongue, not his fists).

I was scared. But I believed that I had to try to promote mutual understanding. I went back and forth between the two groups, mostly talking to the Chinese in our language. I kept urging everyone to calm down, but it only seemed to make them angrier. Some young men in the Chinese group -- those we call fen qing (angry youth) -- started yelling and cursing at me.

What a lot of people don't know is that there were many on the Chinese side who supported me and were saying, "Let her talk." But they were drowned out by the loud minority who had really lost their cool.

Some people on the Chinese side started to insult me for speaking English and told me to speak Chinese only. But the Americans didn't understand Chinese. It's strange to me that some Chinese seem to feel as though not speaking English is expressing a kind of national pride. But language is a tool, a way of thinking and communicating.

At the height of the protest, a group of Chinese men surrounded me, pointed at me and, referring to the young woman who led the 1989 student democracy protests in Tiananmen Square, said, "Remember Chai Ling? All Chinese want to burn her in oil, and you look like her." They said that I had mental problems and that I would go to hell. They asked me where I was from and what school I had attended. I told them. I had nothing to hide. But then it started to feel as though an angry mob was about to attack me. Finally, I left the protest with a police escort.

Back in my dorm room, I logged onto the Duke Chinese Students and Scholars Association (DCSSA) Web site and listserv to see what people were saying. Qian Fangzhou, an officer of DCSSA, was gloating, "We really showed them our colors!"

I posted a letter in response, explaining that I don't support Tibetan independence, as some accused me of, but that I do support Tibetan freedom, as well as Chinese freedom. All people should be free and have their basic rights protected, just as the Chinese constitution says. I hoped that the letter would spark some substantive discussion. But people just criticized and ridiculed me more.

The next morning, a storm was raging online. Photographs of me had been posted on the Internet with the words "Traitor to her country!" printed across my forehead. Then I saw something really alarming: Both my parents' citizen ID numbers had been posted. I was shocked, because this information could only have come from the Chinese police.

I saw detailed directions to my parents' home in China, accompanied by calls for people to go there and teach "this shameless dog" a lesson. It was then that I realized how serious this had become. My phone rang with callers making threats against my life. It was ironic: What I had tried so hard to prevent was precisely what had come to pass. And I was the target.

I talked to my mom the next morning, and she said that she and my dad were going into hiding because they were getting death threats, too. She told me that I shouldn't call them. Since then, short e-mail messages have been our only communication. The other day, I saw photos of our apartment online; a bucket of feces had been emptied on the doorstep. More recently I've heard that the windows have been smashed and obscene posters have been hung on the door. Also, I've been told that after convening an assembly to condemn me, my high school revoked my diploma and has reinforced patriotic education.

I understand why people are so emotional and angry; the events in Tibet have been tragic. But this crucifying of me is unacceptable. I believe that individual Chinese know this. It's when they fire each other up and act like a mob that things get so dangerous.

Now, Duke is providing me with police protection, and the attacks in Chinese cyberspace continue. But contrary to my detractors' expectations, I haven't shriveled up and slunk away. Instead, I've responded by publicizing this shameful incident, both to protect my parents and to get people to reflect on their behavior. I'm no longer afraid, and I'm determined to exercise my right to free speech.

Because language is the bridge to understanding.

grace.wang@duke.edu

Grace Wang is a freshman at Duke University. Scott Savitt, a visiting scholar in Duke's Chinese media studies program, assisted in writing this article.

Friday, April 18, 2008

Tibet

The pro-China crowd appears Chinese whereas the free tibet crowd look more Chinese. Is there some confusion here and if so what is it? I've been impressed lately with how boring words are.

Saturday, April 12, 2008

al gore

It's me, Al Gore, nobel prize winner and earth-saver. A lot of you have wondered what I like to do when I’m not saving the earth. Well I’ll tell you what I like to do: stump jumpin' the hell out of one of my hummers.

But wait a minute you are probably thinking, aren’t you that guy who is against SUVs? Don’t you go around lecturing people about how they should save energy?

Yes, but I’m allowed to drive hummers for the same reason I own a mansion and a private jet: carbon offsetting.
Through carbon offsetting I can lecture people but at the same time do whatever I want. It’s like having your cake and eating it too, while telling other people to not eat cake, that is of course unless they pay someone else to not eat cake so the net effect is that no extra cakes were eaten. See how it works?

For example last year my son wanted a coal-fired pig roast. I told him normally I would be against it because coal burning releases carbon dioxide, but since we’re wealthy all we have to do is pay someone else to not have a coal-fired pig roast. So after paying a local non-profit to skip their annual pig roast, ours became carbon-neutral. Isn't carbon offsetting wonderful?

- Al Gore "

Thursday, April 10, 2008

freud

Behind the laws that structure human society is the horror of incest, and behind that horror are the desire for incest and the murderous capacity to act on that desire.

Monday, April 07, 2008

an agnostic

We don't know if there was an intelligent force behind the big bang or not. The exquisite patterns found in nature, human consciousnees, ethical impulses etc. cause some people to believe there was. I don't know and admit I don't know and am therefore an agnostic.

Some people postulate that the creator of the universe spoke using a human language. On the basis of that belief religions developed: Christianity, Islam, Judaism, for example. These religions have inspired the best and the worst from humanity but are nonetheless based to a large extent on the essentially psychotic notion that God "spoke". Christianity plunges a little deeper and asserts that "God" took on a human form and suffered the tortures that God made possible as a "sacrifice" for the "sins" that he also made possible in order that we "might' be able to spend an eternity at his side.

We have vast amounts of evidence which shows that human beings lie, hallucinate, fear death, feel guilty and seek to delude and aggrandize themselves. What we don't have is a single scrap of hard scientific evidence that God spoke. Yes, we have the testimony of some prophets, whom we admire, and hundreds of thousands of psychotics whom we tend to admire less, but perhaps there is less to differentiate them than some people think. That is my point.

Somebody is right here and somebody is wrong. "God" caused the molecules in the air to vibrate according to the patterns established by a number of languages: Hebrew, Greek if I am not mistaken, or he didn't. Some people believe that he did. I think it is an insane belief to hold given what we now know about the physical world and human psychology. I don't think that people like RDO are completely crazy, just crazy in relation to their religious beliefs. Like the prophets he can function beautifully I imagine, perhaps a lot better than people with no "faith" in an omniscient, compassionate God. Religious faith certainly has it's value as a defense mechanism and that is why it is so common. There is no convincing logical reason to accept it as literal fact however and otherwise perfectly intelligent people who continue to do so are deluding themselves.

science of the mind

Buddhism is the science of the mind. It is the mind watching itself "very" closely and admitting with complete honesty the situation in which it finds itself. Driven by desire and the tendency to compare it becomes aggressive, competitive, jealous, sometimes hostile. This works in complete opposition to the deeper need to connect with people on the basis of love, respect and compassion. If you look at your own psychology you will discover this to be true, or not. Buddhism doesn't dictate anything but simply encourages people to think clearly and be emotionally honest with themselves.

who blames who

Frankly, I blame you.

apologetics

life appears short when viewed from closer to the end than the beginning and all the people acting evililiy was just a big drag really. It would have been better if we hadn't acted that way. There was nothing to "learn" from it but that life is a harsh motherfucker, learn to live with that and maybe you'll find some peace etc.

god

Is there a God?

Snob - Yes, he exists in the from of a deluded alternative to observation and logic. An alternative to resigning to a reality we do not unerstand much about. God does a lot of damage. God wastes our time. God inspires people to drive themselves bonko trying to invent sensible interpreations of hallucinations enjoyed thousands of years ago. Others spend their time analyzing the invented interpretations of hallucinations. Yes, there is definitely a god, and she is driving us crazy.

Saturday, April 05, 2008

oh

Oh. Anyway, I thought he was dead and though he isn't he very soon will be so I will start an internet rumour that Venus was his last movie and leave others to examine the poetic significance of that. Reality is vastly over rated and can give you a coronary rather than a sense of divine providence working through you the way that lying can.

peter no dead

merge - All right kids - Peter O'Toole ain't dead, and he's still working. He's the voice of the food critic in Pixar's latest release Ratatouille, for one, and he's got several other appearances in movies and shows coming up.

peter's old tool

Venus, you will note, does in fact rhyme with penis which is synonymous in this case with Toole, which as per the dictates of British usage is spelled in French and with a great French stress as well on the final syllable. And were that not coincidental enough consider that the last sentence appeared in a novel I once read while driving through Idaho which Peter himself once described as being "pretty." Peter said a great mant witty things like that and with such style and charm that one sometimes wishes he hadn't died at all despite the fact that he'd grown to look quite horrid towards the end etc.

Friday, April 04, 2008

what is truth?

When, during his trial, [b]Jesus is asked "What is truth?" he does not answer.

It must be great to be Jesus. Somebody asks you a question, you don't answer it and 2000 years later people are still talking about what a brilliant answer no answer was. I guess since he was Jesus and all everything he did must have been brilliant. Can't it be possible that he was just pausing to pass gas or something and then forgot what the question was?

Anyway it seems to me that "Truth is reality, but reality is really huge and complicated, so people only understand infintesimal parts of it at a time" is a better answer than the one Jesus gave but anyway, whatever....

look at me

I think that an element of insanity runs through the entire human experience and most of that insanity comes from the anxiety created by our understanding of time and the absolute reality of ethics. If we look forward we see the inevitability of suffering and death, we see that we have choices that might affect when death will occur and how much suffering we will do in the meantime but have no way of knowing with any certainty what the outcome of our choices will be. We know also that the things we do will affect other people and given our innate compassion for them we naturally feel guilty for the wrongs we commit. That is the soul of man and I doubt that it has changed at all over the last two thousand years. The prophets catered to man's anxieties with stories of forgiveness and everlasting life. They either made up these stories or they honestly believed them because they had experienced a temporary split from reality. It doesn't suprise me at all that such sensitive people would write such beautiful texts. Look at me, I'm nuts, but I wrote this.

Taiping proclamation

We have carefully investigated the Manchu Tartars’ origins and have found that their first ancestors were a white fox and a red dog, who copulated together and from their seed produced this race of demons. As their numbers grew they mated together since they had no proper human relationships nor civilization. Availing themselves of China’s lack of real men, they seized the country, established their own demon throne and placed the wild fox upon it; in their court the monkeys bathed and dressed. – from a Taiping proclamation